Some coal power plants may be labeled ‘green’ in revised classification

The Financial Services Authority (OJK) is considering labeling coal-fired power plants “green” if they are connected to supply chains for sustainable industries, such as those of electric vehicles (EVs).  

Experts have criticized the idea and said such a move would be a major step back in the country's commitment to limit carbon emissions. Rather than mobilizing investment for the country, categorizing the burning fossil fuels to produce electricity as a green business activity would undermine the credibility of the taxonomy and hurt the country's financial firms.  

Indonesian Green Taxonomy (THI) Version 1.0 was released last year, but OJK chairman Mahendra Siregar said the agency was in the process of revising the document in response to changes made to the ASEAN Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance in June.  

Notably, the second version of the ASEAN Taxonomy includes the early retirement of coal-fired power plants in the green category, thereby making such activities eligible for sustainable financing.  

"It is the first taxonomy in the world that recognized [the early retirement of coal-fired power plants] as green. In other countries or forums, the activity can be called green only if it is in a package with the construction of renewable energy power plants," Mahendra explained in a press conference on Tuesday. 

He added that the OJK was mulling over the idea of also placing in that category coal-fired power plants used to supply energy for green and sustainable industries, such as the manufacture of EVs and EV batteries.  

"Could the energy to produce such products not be categorized as green? We are in the process of conducting further studies on that," Mahendra said.  

He explained that, in revising the taxonomy, the OJK needed to check whether the products of certain supply chains could have positive impacts on green and renewable energy.  

He also stressed the importance of balancing environmental policies with social advancement and economic development.  

"There is a possibility for calculations to state that as a single integrated union, [a supply chain] could be categorized as green," he said. 

 
The OJK is the government agency tasked with producing the THI in collaboration with several ministries, including the Environment and Forestry Ministry and the Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry. In the process, it is also receiving input from Bank Indonesia and the Finance Ministry’s Fiscal Policy Agency (BKF).  

Greenwashing risk  

Pius Ginting, coordinator of the Association of People's Emancipation and Ecological Action (AEER), said categorizing coal-fired power plants in transitional mineral areas as green contradicted principles of social justice and environmental justice.  

"The number of people living around [critical] mineral industry areas and experiencing respiratory problems because of the worsening air has increased in the industrial area of Morowali, Weda Bay [Central Sulawesi]," he said in a statement.  

Meanwhile, the Asia energy finance campaigner from pressure group Market Forces, Binbin Mariana, said categorizing financing for the construction of coal-fired power plants as green created a risk of “greenwashing” by Indonesian banks.  

"It's very concerning that transition-washing is on the rise as green finance is being used to fund high-carbon companies that do not have a credible plan to shift their business away from fossil fuels," she said. 

Bhima Yudhistira, executive director at the Center of Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS), worried that a taxonomy that still accommodated fossil-fuel-based energy financing would reduce banks' interest in financing renewable energy. Ultimately, the renewables share in the energy mix would remain small. 

Furthermore, Bhima explained that if large amounts of money are spent to build new coal-fired power plants in downstream supply chains, this could cause problems with marketing the products of said supply chains, as prospective buyers like EV companies may look for alternative, greener sources, while consumers would grow skeptical about the shift to EVs.  

"There are dark riders in the green taxonomy development process. THI 2.0 [is supposed to] no longer [accommodate] business sectors that contribute to the carbon emission increase," he said.  

Ahmad Ashov Birry, a coordinator of the antipollution and anticorruption movement #BersihkanIndonesia, opined that the OJK's plan would negatively impact the country's energy transition, including the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP).  

"We will see whether the JETP will experience a further setback and compel President [Joko “Jokowi” Widodo], [United States] President [Joe] Biden, [Japanese] Prime Minister [Fumio] Kishida and others to speak with a forked tongue," Ahmad said.  

Similarly, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) contends that labeling coal-fired power plants green could mislead investors who want assurances that their assets are environmentally friendly. That, according to the US-based think tank, could see Indonesia lose high-quality foreign direct investment (FDI) and render the taxonomy ineffective.  

"If the country goes ahead with the latest idea of using the energy transition to justify new plants' eligibility for green finance, its taxonomy would be the first to recognize coal as green. Not only would national credibility be hurt, but the move might also border on state-sanctioned greenwashing," the institute said in a recent report.  

Furthermore, the IEEFA said the OJK's plan could jeopardize the reputation of domestic financial players if they blindly support investments in coal-fired power plants on the sole basis of the green label in the taxonomy.  

"The OJK appears to believe that it is acceptable to call projects green if they are critical to the economy. However, the authority is making the mistake of confusing a transition need with providing certainty and clarity to investors that its taxonomy is backed by science," the IEEFA said. 

Source: The Jakarta Post 

China, Indonesia discuss extending Jakarta high-speed railway

China and Indonesia discussed potentially extending a multi-billion dollar Beijing-funded railway project, an Indonesian minister said, after Chinese Premier Li Qiang rode the bullet train on a trial run on Wednesday. 

The 142-kilometre high-speed rail line currently connects the capital Jakarta to the city of Bandung. 

The prospect of extending it to Indonesia's second-biggest city of Surabaya, more than 700 kilometers across the island of Java, was discussed with Li and the premier was supportive, senior Indonesian minister Luhut Pandjaitan told reporters. 

Li and Luhut tested the train across a 41-kilometre (25.5 miles) section of the track from Jakarta to Karawang on its outskirts, according to Emir Monti, spokesperson for KCIC, the consortium building the project. 

The US$7.3 billion flagship project of Indonesian President Joko Widodo, which is part of China's Belt and Road Initiative, has faced a range of problems from land procurement issues, delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic and ballooning costs. 

Indonesia has set a target for commercial launch of the Jakarta-Bandung track on Oct. 1, far behind its original target of 2019. 

But even as Li tried the train, the project had not received an operational permit from Indonesia's transport ministry, which was waiting on results of safety checks, Transport Minister Budi Karya Sumadi said. 

However, Budi said he was sure the project was safe. 

"(Li) was very satisfied. He said the quality was the same with the ones in China," Luhut said. 

KCIC is made up of Indonesian and Chinese state companies, which include construction firm Wijaya Karya and China Railway Engineering Corporation. 

Li is in Jakarta to attend high-level meetings with leaders of countries in Southeast Asia and beyond. 

Source: Reuters 

Indonesia offers 'golden visa' to entice foreign investors

Indonesia is introducing a golden visa scheme to attract foreign individual and corporate investors in an attempt to boost its national economy, a statement from the ministry of law and human rights distributed on Sunday (Sep 3) said. 

“The golden visa is granting a residence permit for an extended period of five to 10 years," director general of immigration, Silmy Karim said in the statement. 

The five-year visa requires individual investors to set up a company worth US$2.5 million, while for the 10 years visa, a $5 million investment is required. 

Other countries around the world including the US, Ireland, New Zealand and Spain have introduced similar golden visas for investors, seeking to attract capital and entrepreneurial residents. 

Meanwhile, corporate investors are required to invest $25 million to get five-year visas for directors and commissioners. They need to invest double, or $50 million, to gain a 10-year visa. 

Different provisions apply to individual foreign investors who do not want to establish a company in the Southeast Asian country. 

The requirements range from $350,000 to $700,000 in funds that can be used to purchase the Indonesian government bonds. 

“Once they arrive in Indonesia, golden visa holders no longer need to apply for permit,” Silmy Karim said. 

Source: CNA